Philippe Auclair recently claimed in an interview with Gooner Talk that UEFA president gives him ‘the mental equivalent of a nappy rash’. The music producer-turned-football journalist voiced an opinion as to what most think. The outspoken Frenchman he referred to has an altruistic view of the world’s biggest sport and has the power to make his vision come true. But are his ideals totally driven by this pure vision or is there a monetary reason behind the dream? Will he ‘kill’ football as he accuses others of doing so?

His idea of increasing the number of teams in the UEFA European Championships from 16 to 24 can only be described as baffling. Having witnessed one of the finest footballing spectacles in recent years, Platini decided to increase the number of sides in the competition. Most fans realise the World Cup lacks the quality of a smaller tournament, with mediocre sides qualifying for the 32 man finals. These teams adopt a defensive mentality and lower the quality of attacking football. Therefore why allow these sides an easier path to the biggest stage?

It would be more difficult to find a host which would support an even greater number of sides for a few weeks in the summer. If the idea is to rejuvenate poorer countries such as Poland and the Ukraine, it isn’t working. These sides formerly of the Soviet bloc are struggling to have the infrastructure in place for sixteen sides in time for 2012, so how could they do so for twenty four teams? Obviously, a larger number of sides mean more matches, and so more revenue from television and tickets. Not to mention the amount of advertising and business partners UEFA accumulates when the time of the main event arrives.

This money-motivated agenda continued with Platini announcing a new format for the second tier European club competition. The UEFA Cup is already bloated despite Platini’s assurances:

 “The new format will give the UEFA Europa League a successful new impetus”

Most realise that this apparent urge to give more fans a taste of European club football is just a ploy to gather more money by the executives at UEFA. The recent Champions League final included Manchester United and Chelsea, whereas the UEFA Cup involved Glasgow Rangers and Zenit St. Petersburg. Which game do you think had the bigger draw?

UEFA can rebrand the tournament as many times as they like, but the fact remains the same. It will remain a second tier competition as long as the Champions League exists. After these business-based actions, Platini has no leg to stand on in criticising Arsene Wenger for a similar attitude. The long-serving Arsenal boss was attacked by his countryman who seemed to be on an agenda. The hypocritical UEFA president spoke of Wenger only wanting:

“To talk about football, he (Wenger) only cares about business. We must shut up with Wenger and everything. He is an extremely selfish person.”

How ironic considering his recent actions to make UEFA even wealthier. The Euro 1984 winner was a wonderful playmaker but as a politician he is fast losing his highly esteemed reputation.